Submitted by Laurent GUERBY (not verified) on Sat, 2006-08-26 13:14.

Hi, I've heard there's a bias in traditionnal science publishing: when scientists build datasets through experiment but fail to find evidence of what they're looking for so no publication occur. PLoS ONE could change that, publishing "failed" research with author detailed comments and dataset, in the hope someone will see the light. We all learn from our mistakes, may be there's a lot of science to gain for submitting your own failures online :).

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options
Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.
Please enter capital letters only.