Channels
Recent blog posts
- Call for Designs: The PLoS Computational Biology 2010 T-shirt
- PLoS Computational Biology at ISMB
- New user functionality - referenced PDFs via Pubget
- Announcing PLoS EzReprint - new and improved!
- PLoS Pathogens featured in This Week in Virology
- New spring range now available in the PLoS Store
- Details on Outage and Recovery of PLoS Journal Websites
- PLoS Journals Outage - January 19, 2010
- Announcing a new PLoS Collection, Tagging of Pacific Predators (TOPP)
- PLoS ONE indexed by Web of Science
Welcome to the PLoS Blog
Blogroll
Who Links to Us?
Peter,
I thought that was Perelman's stance but when I was writing the entry this morning I couldn't find a confirmatory reference. Why I didn't check Open Access News is beyond me. Thank you for pointing this out.
You are absolutely right that Perelman would most likely find PLoS ONE too 'conventional'. However, unlike him, the vast majority of scientific disciplines aren't embracing arXiv and its philosophy. PLoS ONE is aimed more at these disciplines, trying to provide them with the benefits of open, retroactive review but in a way that they will find more attractive.
Reply
Any opinions expressed in these blogs are the personal views of the contributors, and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of PLoS. Use of the PLoS blogs and the PLoS Web Sites is at all times subject to our Terms of Use.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
Recent comments