Submitted by Bradley Voytek (not verified) on Thu, 2006-08-03 23:57.

I've been talking for years about how valuable a Journal of Null Results would be. Granted, it wouldn't be interesting necessarily, but a repository or database where one could look up someone's failed methods would prevent a lot of unnecessary reproduction of failed attempts.

Also, the ability to add comments (especially if authors' identities could be verified) to a research publication would be a revolution in peer-reviewed publications. If the PLoS is planning on adding that functionality, it will win many converts I believe.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options
Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.
Please enter capital letters only.