Submitted by Sergio Stagnaro MD (not verified) on Mon, 2008-11-10 14:21.

I have unhearded underscored in www.nature.com, as well as in WashingtonPost.com that the present utilization of stem cells is dangerous since scientists do not know perfectly all biophysical-semeiotic constitutions of donors:
http://blogs.nature.com/reports/theniche/2008/04/stemcell_skin_creams_a_san_die.html#comments
http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080130/full/451511a.html?q=2#last-comment
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/comments/display?contentID=AR2007041101736&start=41
http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080822/full/news.2008.1060.html?q=2#last-comment
http://blogs.nature.com/reports/theniche/2008/06/pfizer_dips_a_toe_into_cell_th.html#comments
http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080604/full/news.2008.875.html?q=2#last-comment
http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2008/09/obama_speaks_on_science.html#comments
http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2007/09/californias_new_stem_cell_supr.html

As a consequence, osteoporosis in children, leukemia a.s.o. have already occured. This is a topic to be considered accurately, from etical standpoint.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options
Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.
Please enter capital letters only.