![]() |
ChannelsRecent blog posts
Welcome to the PLoS BlogBlogrollWho Links to Us?Due to my experience, I agree with the statement "high profile" journals such as Nature, Science and Cell do not publish clinical trials. As a matter of fact, similar papers are rejected because of their nature, in spite of their real scientific value. At this point, it seems paradoxical that famous peer-reviews do not accept, rejecting them, clinical articles illustrating quantum biophysical semeiotic theories, based on no-local realm, because Editors and/or Reviewers are not able - for instance - to bedside assess "simultaneous in space" and "synchronous in time" events as that described in my Lory's Experiment! (Ask Google.com). Reply |
|
Any opinions expressed in these blogs are the personal views of the contributors, and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of PLoS. Use of the PLoS blogs and the PLoS Web Sites is at all times subject to our Terms of Use.
|
Recent comments