Submitted by Sergio Stagnaro MD (not verified) on Sat, 2008-11-22 09:24.

Due to my experience, I agree with the statement "high profile" journals such as Nature, Science and Cell do not publish clinical trials. As a matter of fact, similar papers are rejected because of their nature, in spite of their real scientific value. At this point, it seems paradoxical that famous peer-reviews do not accept, rejecting them, clinical articles illustrating quantum biophysical semeiotic theories, based on no-local realm, because Editors and/or Reviewers are not able - for instance - to bedside assess "simultaneous in space" and "synchronous in time" events as that described in my Lory's Experiment! (Ask Google.com).
On the contrary, papers lacking of scientific true are willkommen and published.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options
Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.
Please enter capital letters only.