![]() |
ChannelsRecent blog posts
Welcome to the PLoS BlogBlogrollWho Links to Us?On the Origins of SyphilisSubmitted by Shabnam Sigman on Wed, 2008-01-23 17:48.
Did Christopher Columbus and his men introduce syphilis into Renaissance Europe, after contracting it during their voyage to the New World? Or does this pathogen have a much older history? A study by Kristin Harper and colleagues published last week in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases lends support to what’s known as the Columbian theory of syphilis’s origin while suggesting that the non-sexually-transmitted subspecies arose earlier in the Old World. The study spread throughout both mainstream press and science blogosphere alike, as did a related Expert Commentary, written by Connie Mulligan and colleagues, that challenged the methods and findings of the syphilis study. Bora made sure that “syphilis” was the buzzword of the day on ScienceBlogs, and three of his SciBlings’ amazing blogs are highlighted here: Aetiology: Where did syphilis come from? Jonathan Eisen also blogged about the paper, and drew our attention to a CBC Radio interview with one of the study’s co-authors that you can listen to here. Carl Zimmer wrote about the paper in Science, and mentions it on his blog. The study was picked up by more than 100 outlets total. Some of the excellent coverage is highlighted here: Daily Mail: How Columbus came home with more than he expected The paper was also covered by Economist, Bloomberg, CBC News, CTV.ca, ABC News, MSNBC, Fox News, and, quite unfortunately, Rush Limbaugh. Trackback URL for this post:http://www.plos.org/cms/trackback/317
( categories: In the News | PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases )
Reply |
|
Any opinions expressed in these blogs are the personal views of the contributors, and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of PLoS. Use of the PLoS blogs and the PLoS Web Sites is at all times subject to our Terms of Use.
|
Recent comments