Channels
Recent blog posts
- PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases at ASTMH 2008
- Data access and the NHS - more research versus patient privacy?
- New Academic Editor Interview - Niyaz Ahmed
- "There's no easy way to say this. . ."
- Academic Editor Interview - Ivan Baxter
- New version of the Declaration of Helsinki
- Low-Hanging Fruit: An Anti-Parasitic Drug Database
- New interview with PLoS ONE author
- PLoS Genetics at ASHG 2008
- Interview with a PLoS ONE author
Welcome to the PLoS Blog
Blogroll
Who Links to Us?
Given that the impact factor is a shifty number, it is strange to me that it is still quoted all over the PLoS Biology pages. If it weren't a favourable number (closer to 3, as could be possible for PLoS Medicine), would it still get prominent placement on the site? At the very least, I think any reference to the impact factor of PLoS journals should link to that PLoS Medicine article.
Reply
Any opinions expressed in these blogs are the personal views of the contributors, and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of PLoS. Use of the PLoS blogs and the PLoS Web Sites is at all times subject to our Terms of Use.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
Recent comments