Channels
Recent blog posts
- Call for Designs: The PLoS Computational Biology 2010 T-shirt
- PLoS Computational Biology at ISMB
- New user functionality - referenced PDFs via Pubget
- Announcing PLoS EzReprint - new and improved!
- PLoS Pathogens featured in This Week in Virology
- New spring range now available in the PLoS Store
- Details on Outage and Recovery of PLoS Journal Websites
- PLoS Journals Outage - January 19, 2010
- Announcing a new PLoS Collection, Tagging of Pacific Predators (TOPP)
- PLoS ONE indexed by Web of Science
Welcome to the PLoS Blog
Blogroll
Who Links to Us?
Given that the impact factor is a shifty number, it is strange to me that it is still quoted all over the PLoS Biology pages. If it weren't a favourable number (closer to 3, as could be possible for PLoS Medicine), would it still get prominent placement on the site? At the very least, I think any reference to the impact factor of PLoS journals should link to that PLoS Medicine article.
Reply
Any opinions expressed in these blogs are the personal views of the contributors, and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of PLoS. Use of the PLoS blogs and the PLoS Web Sites is at all times subject to our Terms of Use.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
Recent comments