Submitted by Deepak (not verified) on Sun, 2007-02-11 15:51.

Chris

One of the problems as I see it is the mechanism for commenting. Annotations are easy. Just highlight and comment. But the discussion aspect, probably the most important one, is a little difficult at best. Here are the problems I see

Feeds - If I could have custom feeds for topics that interest me, I'd be doing a lot of commenting right there. Right now, it's difficult to keep up.

Community - PLoS One for all its goodness, still feels like a repository of papers as opposed to a place which fosters communication and discussion. That probably explains why there is commentary on the GXP blog. Perhaps one way around it would be to grab discussion about a paper and display it next to the paper itself. That way, it becomes a portal of scientific discussion in itself.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options
Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.
Please enter capital letters only.