![]() |
ChannelsRecent blog posts
Welcome to the PLoS BlogBlogrollWho Links to Us?Emma Veitch's blogTo IRB or not to IRB?Submitted by Emma Veitch on Tue, 2008-07-29 09:46.
The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), of which PLoS Medicine, and other PLoS journals, are members, has recently released guidance for editors on the thorny topic of "research, audit and service evaluations". This guidance aims to help editors decide how to handle their journal's requirement for ethical review in relation to these types of studies. As outlined by COPE, most journals require that for any research involving human subjects, the study has been approved by a properly constituted ethics committee. ( categories: PLoS Medicine )
Prying into protocolsSubmitted by Emma Veitch on Tue, 2008-07-22 09:00.
Just spotted an interesting letter in last week's Lancet discussing selective reporting of clinical trials. This may sound like something you've heard many times before (eg here) but in the Lancet letter the authors describe what happenned to trials for which the original protocols were posted on Lancet's own website. ( categories: PLoS Medicine )
Your input on how clinical trials should be reported - public consultations at WHO and ClinicalTrials.gov soon to closeSubmitted by Emma Veitch on Mon, 2008-06-16 08:09.
In the US, a new law will very soon require sponsors of clinical trials to start submitting data on the results of completed trials into an expanded version of the registry website clinicaltrials.gov. ( categories: PLoS Medicine )
Children's medicines matterSubmitted by Emma Veitch on Fri, 2007-12-07 07:45.
Editors spend so much of every day with their heads thoroughly immersed, indeed swimming, in research papers, that it can be heartening to hear about initiatives that aim to prioritise the studies that really will make a difference. Yesterday I happenned to drop in to a press conference that was being held to launch the World Health Organization's new initiative, "Make Medicines Child Size". ( categories: PLoS Medicine )
QuackbustersSubmitted by Emma Veitch on Fri, 2007-11-16 03:50.
Editors rarely have much to delight them on cold Friday mornings in Cambridgeshire so here at PLoS-UK HQ there was a frisson of excitement over Ben Goldacre's latest blog. It seems faintly ridiculous that around 50 years after the first properly randomized trials were done (and please don't quote me on specifics here, because I'm not a trials historian - check out the James Lind Library if you want more precision), anyone has to defend the importance of scientific rigour, appropriate controls, and dispassionate appraisal of all the available evidence. And yet with respect to the practice of homeopathy, someone has to go to the trouble of laying out the basic principles of evidence-based medicine: just read the blog to find out why. ( categories: PLoS Medicine )
|
|
Any opinions expressed in these blogs are the personal views of the contributors, and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of PLoS. Use of the PLoS blogs and the PLoS Web Sites is at all times subject to our Terms of Use.
|
Recent comments